Cases 1 - 10 of 3,958
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Mark J. Dinsmore
as 24-2065
Petitioner:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Respondent:
MARK J. DINSMORE
ATTIA v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04778
Plaintiff:
SAHAR ATTIA
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Director Christopher A. Wray, District Director Thomas Cioppa and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. v. Meyer
as 1:2024cv04623
Plaintiff:
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. d/b/a Airlines for America
Defendant:
Kenneth J. Meyer
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Rojas v. Barnes et al
as 1:2024cv04381
Defendant:
J. Mandella Barnes, Mandela Barnes, Mandela Barnes for Wisconsin and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Christopher Cisco v. Sue E. Myerscough, et al
as 24-1854
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER CISCO
Respondent:
SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, SARA DARROW and COLLEEN R. LAWLESS
Interested Party:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ANDREW L. KILLIAN, STATE OF ILLINOIS and others
Tobiason v. BMO Bank NA
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ean J Tobiason
Defendant:
BMO Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
George Krueger, Jr. v. Reona Daly
as 24-1820
Petitioner:
GEORGE KRUEGER, JR.
Respondent:
REONA J. DALY
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03853
Plaintiff:
J-M Manufacturing Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Simons Hanly Conroy, LLP, Nicholas Angelides, Perry Browder and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Tramale J. Hooser
as 24-1789
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TRAMALE J. HOOSER
Lynch v. Harris & Harris, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv03510
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Lynch
Defendant:
Harris & Harris, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
