Cases 1 - 10 of 270
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Tom Hensiek, et al v. Board of Directors of Casino Queen Holding Company, et al
as 24-8007
Petitioner:
TOM HENSIEK, JASON GILL and LILLIAN WROBEL
Respondent:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CASINO QUEEN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., CHARLES BIDWILL, III, JAMES G. KOMAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re Manufactured Home Lot Rents Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2023cv14847
Plaintiff:
Linda Harris, Charles Neville, Sandra Hoffman and others
Defendant:
Datacomp Appraisal Systems, Inc., Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., Hometown America Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Karen Mejia Peralta v. Merrick Garland
as 23-2917
Petitioner:
KAREN J. MEJIA PERALTA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States
Bodie v. Lime Lush Boutique, LLC
as 1:2023cv14277
Plaintiff:
Karen Bodie
Defendant:
Lime Lush Boutique, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Michael Bargo, Jr. v. Karen McNaught
as 23-2793
Petitioner:
MICHAEL E. BARGO, JR.
Respondent:
KAREN L. MCNAUGHT
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2023cv10008
Defendant:
Karen Roland, L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dahlem v. Yarbrough
as 1:2023cv04715
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Dahlem
Defendant:
Karen A Yarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
