Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Richard Thomas Gardipee v. Kevin Carr, et al
as 24-1155
Petitioner:
RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE
Respondent:
KEVIN CARR, Secretary for the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, TONY EVERS, Governor of Wisconsin, LYNN ADELMAN, Judge and others
John Seely v. Holly A. Brady
as 22-2553
Petitioner:
JOHN SEELY
Respondent:
HOLLY A. BRADY
Interested Party:
JAMES SEELY, PHILLIP E. HOUK, Allen County Magistrate Judge, GREGORY PACHMAYR, Clerk of the Indiana Court of Appeals and others
Jimmy Riley v. Peter Oppeneer
as 22-1115
Petitioner:
JIMMY RILEY
Respondent:
PETER OPPENEER, Magistrate Judge
Interested Party:
BRIAN LANG, JACOB ZIMMERMAN, ADAM THIELEN and others
Louis Gonzalez v. Elaine E. Bucklo, et al
as 21-3106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS GONZALEZ, also known as Carlos Ramos Sanchez
Defendant / Appellee:
ELAINE E. BUCKLO, Magistrate Judge, THOMAS G. BRUTON, Clerk of the Court and UNKNOWN COURT REPORTER
Scott Peters v. Donald Wilkerson, et al
as 17-1068
Petitioner:
SCOTT PETERS
Respondent:
DONALD G. WILKERSON, Magistrate Judge and NANCY J. ROSENSTENGEL, District Judge
Party-in-Interest:
KIM BUTLER, Warden, JOHN TROST, Doctor, JOHN R. BALDWIN, IDOC Director in his official capacity only and others
Jose L. Yanez v. Michael J. Reagan, et al
as 13-2157
Petitioner:
JOSE L. YANEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. REAGAN, District Judge and STEPHEN C. WILLIAMS, Magistrate Judge
Thomas Balsiger, et al v. Charles Clevert, Jr., et al
as 13-1755
Petitioner:
THOMAS C. BALSIGER and JAMES C. CURREY
Respondent:
CHARLES N. CLEVERT, JR., District Judge and PATRICIA J. GORENCE, Magistrate Judge
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas Balsiger, et al v. Charles Clevert, Jr., et al
as 13-1334
Petitioner:
THOMAS C. BALSIGER and JAMES C. CURREY
Respondent:
CHARLES N. CLEVERT, JR., District Judge and PATRICIA J. GORENCE, Magistrate Judge
Party-in-Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
