Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Prince et al v. Attorney General of Illinois et al
as 1:2021cv05659
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Prince, Angel Prince, Earl Prince, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Attorney General of Illinois, City of Chicago, Calahan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Martin v. State of Illinois, et al
as 21-1149
Defendant / Appellee:
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHCARE AND FAMILY SERVICES, KIMBERLY M. FOXX, CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MARTIN
Ruben Sanchez v. U.S. Ill Cook Chicago Judge La
as 19-1836
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN DEFENDANTS, listed as "U.S. Ill Cook Chicago Judge Lawers COP Union"
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBEN SANCHEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv01934
Defendant:
United States of America , Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Thomas E. Perez and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Ates v. First Choice Assets LLC et al
as 1:2015cv06606
Plaintiff:
Victoria G Ates
Defendant:
First Choice Assets LLC, Unkown Defendant 1, Unknown Defendant 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
David Johnson v. John Tharp, Jr.
as 15-2452
Petitioner:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Respondent:
JOHN J. THARP, JR.
Party-in-Interest:
GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY, TANYA JENSEN, BLANE J. BRUMMOND and others
David Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, Incorpora, et al
as 14-3656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MELTON TRUCK LINES, INCORPORATED, ROBERT A. PETERSON, MICHAEL DARGEL and others
Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv08817
Plaintiff:
David M. Johnson
Defendant:
Melton Truck Lines, INC., Robert A. Peterson, Michael Dargel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
