Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Marcelo v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv05759
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Marc Marcelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurzynski v. Otis Elevator Company
as 1:2018cv02296
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kurzynski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dawkins v. Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC, et al
as 1:2017cv01369
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey T Dawkins
Defendant:
Ameristar Casino East Chicago LLC , Ameristar East Chicago Holdings, LLC , Pinnacle Entertainment, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00227
Plaintiff:
Demarco Martin , Ralph Weatherspoon , Albert Zachery and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brownlee et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00228
Plaintiff:
Renoldo Brownlee , Michael Caballero , Ronald Chamberlain and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holt v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09544
Plaintiff:
Otis Holt
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc. and Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Layne v. Otis Elevator Company
as 3:2015cv00903
Plaintiff:
Janet L. Layne
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 1:2015cv06398
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company and Boyd Gaming
Plaintiff:
Robin Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kirkland v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06597
Plaintiff:
Otis Kirkland
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc. and Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelmire v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51906
Plaintiff:
Otis Shelmire
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.