Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Cabot v. Nashville Management, Inc.
as 1:2018cv02569
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cabot
Defendant:
Nashville Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Hibachi Seafood Buffet H & Z, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01744
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Hibachi Seafood Buffet H & Z, Inc. and Li Guang Zheng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. EXI, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01273
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
EXI, Inc. and Carolann Roche
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Acosta v. Payawal et al
as 1:2018cv00609
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Roy M. Payawal, Edward J. Novak and Sacred Heart Hospital Profit Sharing 401(k) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Acosta v. Lucky Strike Entertainment, LLC
as 1:2017cv09275
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Lucky Strike Entertainment, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. Talbert et al
as 1:2017cv09222
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Frank Eric Talbert, The Proteus Group, LLC and The Proteus Group 401(k) Retirement Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Corner v. Acosta
as 1:2017cv08134
Plaintiff:
Mary Corner
Defendant:
Alexander Acosta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acosta v. AEU Benefits, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv07931
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
AEU Benefits, LLC , AEU Holdings, LLC , Black Wolf Consulting, Inc. and others
Receiver:
Receivership Management, Inc. as Independent Fiduciary
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Bermudez et al v. Cubicle Concepts, LLC. et al
as 1:2017cv06933
Plaintiff:
Jose Bermudez and Alexander Palos
Defendant:
Cubicle Concepts, LLC. and Andrew Oziemblo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Abdi et al v. Scrub, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05136
Plaintiff:
Phillip Jordan, Eusebio Calderon, Edgar Barajas and others
Defendant:
Teresa Kaminska, Mark Rathke and Scrub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
