Labor Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Williams et al v. Shapiro et al
as 1:2022cv04868
Plaintiff: Eboni Williams, Debbie Shoemaker, Paula Mays and others
Defendant: Gerald Shapiro, Scott Brinkley, Jamie Zelvin and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
R.S., et al v. IDology, Inc.
as 1:2022cv03479
Plaintiff: R.S., a Minor, by and through her Guardian SARAH DOVER, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, R.S. and Sarah Dover
Defendant: IDOLOGY, INC.
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Day v. Humana Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv03141
Plaintiff: Brittany Day, on her own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Brittany Day
Defendant: OSF Healthcare System Group Medical and Dental Plan and Humana Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, By and Through Corinne M. Koch, in Her Capacity as a Fiduciary et al v. Tabitha Ventures, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01017
Plaintiff: International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, By and Through Corinne M. Koch, in Her Capacity as a Fiduciary , Painters District Council #58 401(k) Trust Fund, By and Through Its Board of Trustees and Painters District Council #58 Fringe Benefit Funds
Defendant: Tabitha Ventures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Michael Finegan, et al v. Christine Brannon, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-2967
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL FINEGAN and DONNIE ROGERS
Defendant - Appellee: CHRISTINE BRANNON, Warden, Individually and in her official capacity, TONY MCCUBBIN, Individually and in his official capacity, ROBERT STOLLARS, Individually and in his official capacity and others
Rasul Freelain v. Village of Oak Park, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-4074
Plaintiff - Appellant: RASUL FREELAIN
Defendant - Appellee: VILLAGE OF OAK PARK, a municipal corporation and DINA VARDAL, Sergeant, in her individual capacity
Marybeth Lauderdale v. Illinois Department of Human S, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-3830
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARYBETH LAUDERDALE
Defendant - Appellee: ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, MICHELLE R.B. SADDLER, sued in her individual capacity, ROBERT KILBURY, sued in his individual capacity and others
Leonard Fuqua v. Megan Brennan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEONARD FUQUA
Defendant - Appellee: MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General, in her official capacity and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Chicago District Office, sue in its official capacity as a mail distribution center funded by the United States Government operating and existing under the laws of the State Government under the laws of the State of Illinois
Deschepper et al v. Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv08379
Plaintiff: Demian C Deschepper , Harrison Pious , Michael Olson and others
Defendant: Midwest Wine & Spirits, Inc., Midwest Wine and Spirits, Inc. and David Gargano
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chicago Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & Trust and Chicago Oral & Maxillofacial Sugery, Ltd., as Plan Administrator for Chicago Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Ltd. Defi v. Dorota Opalinska Chaban, both individually and in We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv06358
Plaintiff: Chicago Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension Plan & Trust and Chicago Oral & Maxillofacial Sugery, Ltd., as Plan Administrator for Chicago Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Ltd. Defi
Defendant: Dorota Opalinska Chaban, both individually and in her capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of Irena Opalinska
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?