Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv11108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Frisch v. AllianceOne Receivables Management Inc
as 2:2015cv00926
Plaintiff:
Gene J Frisch
Defendant:
AllianceOne Receivables Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maple v. AllianceOne Receivables Management Inc
as 2:2015cv02118
Plaintiff:
Dawn Maple
Defendant:
Allianceone Receivables Management Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
IN RE: Capital One Telephone
as 15-1639
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES C. PATTERSON, BRIDGETT AMADECK, TIFFANY ALARCON and others
Appellant:
DEVERA BARTTE, Objector
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC, LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP and others
IN RE: Capital One Telephone
as 15-1586
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES C. PATTERSON, BRIDGETT AMADECK, TIFFANY ALARCON and others
Appellant:
PAMELA MCCOY, Objector
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC, LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP and others
IN RE: Capital One Telephone
as 15-1546
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES C. PATTERSON, BRIDGETT AMADECK, TIFFANY ALARCON and others
Appellant:
JEFFREY COLLINS, Objector
Defendant - Appellee:
ALLIED INTERSTATE, LLC, LEADING EDGE RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, LLC, UNITED RECOVERY SYSTEMS, LP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
