Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Long v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:14-cv-02670
Plaintiff:
James G. Long
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. , Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Incorporated
Quackenbush v. Keurig Green Mountain Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03032
Plaintiff:
Timothy Quackenbush
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain Inc., Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Inc. and Keurig Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Burkley v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:14-cv-02692
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Burkley
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. , Keurig, Incorporated and Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
Burkley v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02692
Plaintiff:
Kenneth B. Burkley
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc., Keurig, Incorporated and Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Long v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02670
Plaintiff:
James G. Long
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Hashem v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02582
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hashem
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc., Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Overton v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Ken Overton
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fortitech, Inc. v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
Fortitech, Inc.
Defendant:
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Springer v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. et al
as NYS/1:14-cv-02267
Plaintiff:
Todd W. Springer
Defendant:
Keurig Green Mountain, Inc. , Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. and Keurig, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
