Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Fleming et al v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv06117
Plaintiff:
Virgil Fleming , Richard Gawlik , Roy Wesson and others
Defendant:
Unilever United States, Inc., Conopco, Inc., Health and Welfare Plan for Hourly Retirees of Unilever and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Association of Administrative, et al v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-1953
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSOCIATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, JUDICIAL COUNCIL NO. 1 IFPTE, AFL-CIO & CLC, CYNTHIA BRETTHAUER, ROBIN L. HENRIE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. Sloan Valve Company
as 1:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and Local 7999 United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Sloan Valve Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
FreightCar America, Inc. v. United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC et al
as 1:2013cv04889
Plaintiff:
FreightCar America, Inc.
Defendant:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC , David Alt, Larry Amann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
United Steel, Paper and Forest, et al v. PPG Industries, Incorporated
as 13-2468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER AND FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL AND SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC and LOCAL UNION 193-G
Defendant - Appellee:
PPG INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Silgan Equipment Company
as 1:2013cv03484
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Industrial and Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Silgan Equipment Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Association of Administrative Law Judges, Judicial Council No. 1 IFPTE, AFL-CIO & CLC et al v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv02925
Plaintiff:
Association of Administrative Law Judges, Judicial Council No. 1 IFPTE, AFL-CIO & CLC , Cynthia M. Bretthauer , Robin L Henrie and others
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Alpha Baking Company, et. al.
as 1:2012cv09026
Plaintiff:
Local Union No. 1, Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Alpha Baking Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC et al v. Cequent Towing Products
as 3:2012cv00713
Plaintiff:
United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO-CLC and Local 9550 United Steel Paper and Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
Defendant:
Cequent Towing Products
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Kraft Foods Global, Inc. et al v. Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union UFCW CLC et al
as 1:2011cv06498
Plaintiff:
Kraft Foods Global, Inc. and Kraft Foods Global, Inc. Retiree Medical Plan
Defendant:
Retail Wholesale and Department Store Union UFCW CLC and United Cereal, Bakery and Foodworkers Local 374 of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, AFL-CIO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
