Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Dimitrai Cabell v. Daniel Sproul
as 21-2357
Petitioner / Appellant:
DIMITRAI CABELL
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
William White v. Daniel Sproul
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 21-2202
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Emmert Jr
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2021cv00514
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Petitioner:
David Emmert Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hilton v. Sproul
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2021cv00438
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Petitioner:
Paul William Hilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cabell v. Sproul
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2021cv00322
Respondent:
Daniel Sproul
Petitioner:
Dimitrai Cabell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Matthew Sullivan v. Daniel Sproul
as 21-1505
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW SULLIVAN
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
William White v. Daniel Sproul
as 20-3486
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Nathaniel Clay v. Daniel Sproul
as 20-2628
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
Petitioner / Appellant:
NATHANIEL CLAY
White v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2020cv00751
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Defendant:
Daniel Sproul and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clinton Williams v. D. Sproul
as 20-1585
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
Petitioner / Appellant:
CLINTON WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.