Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Tresnawati v. Boeing Co., The
as 1:2019cv01924
Plaintiff:
Rd. Tris Tresnawati
Defendant:
Boeing Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manik v. Boeing Co., The
as 1:2019cv01932
Plaintiff:
Dewi Marlina Manik
Defendant:
Boeing Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sagala v. Boeing Co., The
as 1:2019cv01935
Plaintiff:
Santi Amarti Sagala
Defendant:
Boeing Co., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wang v. The Boeing Company
as 1:2016cv04555
Defendant:
The Boeing Co.
Plaintiff:
Guanyi Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Feng v. The Boeing Co.
as 1:2016cv04509
Defendant:
The Boeing Co.
Plaintiff:
Lei Feng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Gao v. The Boeing Co.
as 1:2016cv04468
Defendant:
The Boeing Co.
Plaintiff:
Jingbo Gao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Hu v. The Boeing Co.
as 1:2016cv04465
Defendant:
The Boeing Co.
Plaintiff:
Xiufang Hu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Fletcher et al v. Ajax Magnethermic Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00779
Plaintiff:
Raymond Fletcher and Patricia Fletcher
Defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
Pneumo Abex LLC
Cross_defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fletcher et al v. Ajax Magnethermic Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv00765
Plaintiff:
Raymond Fletcher and Patricia Fletcher
Defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cross_claimant:
Honeywell International, Inc. , Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Eaton Corporation and others
Cross_defendant:
Ajax Magnethermic Corporation, Asbestos Corporation LTD., Boeing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Zhang v. The Boeing Co.
as 1:2013cv07434
Defendant:
The Boeing Co.
Plaintiff:
Bin Zhang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Airline Crash
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
