Cases 61 - 70 of 751
Medina v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01023
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Olga E. Medina
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00343
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06845
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. Jovante Champion
as 22-3101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOVANTE L. CHAMPION, also known as YUNG MEDINA, MEDINA and JUNIOR
Christine Boardman v. Service Employees International Union, et al
as 22-2957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTINE BOARDMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, also known as SEIU, ELISEO MEDINA, DIAN PALMER, Individually and as Co-Trustee of SEIU Local 73 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
