Cases filed in the Seventh Circuit Courts
Cases 71 - 80 of 52,543
Erin Schweitzer v. USA
as 24-1897
Applicant: ERIN D. SCHWEITZER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Ausencio Martinez
as 24-1890
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: AUSENCIO MARTINEZ
USA v. Brandon Shoffner
as 24-1891
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRANDON SHOFFNER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1887
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
United States of America v. In the Matter of the Search of: The cellular telephone, further described in Attachment A
as 1:2024mc00384
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In the Matter of the Search of: The cellular telephone, further described in Attachment A
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04153
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04132
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
United States of America v. In the Matter of the Search of: the United States Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505 5138 1059 4136 8110 38,further described in Attachment A
as 1:2024mc00380
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: In the Matter of the Search of: the United States Priority Mail package bearing tracking number 9505 5138 1059 4136 8110 38,
Everest National Insurance Company v. Baysinger Architects PLLC et al
as 3:2024cv01347
Plaintiff: Everest National Insurance Company
Defendant: Baysinger Architects PLLC and Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Type: Contract Insurance
Sebastian Nowak v. Merrick B. Garland
as 24-1877
Petitioner: SEBASTIAN NOWAK
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General of the United States

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?