Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Payne v. A. W. Chesterton Company et al
as 3:2011cv00820
Defendant:
3M, Uniroyal Holding, Inc, Crane Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Baker v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Thomas Franklin Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Aldrich Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rees v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00063
Plaintiff:
Leslie E Rees
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Beazer East and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Stephens v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00633
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Stephens
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc., American Standard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. Foster Wheeler et al
as 3:2008cv00755
Plaintiff:
Arvid Johnson and May Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company, A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sether et al v. AGCO Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00809
Plaintiff:
Warren W. Sether, Warren W. Sether, Warren W. Sether and others
Defendant:
AGCO Corporation, Alfa Laval, Inc., Allis-Chalmers Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark International, Inc.
as 1:2006cv01254
Plaintiff:
Static Control Components, Inc.
Defendant:
Lexmark International, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Static Control Components, Inc., Wazana Brothers International, Inc., Pendl Companies, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Lexmark International, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc., Lexmark International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
