Cases 1 - 10 of 424
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04916
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rana v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Ravi Rana
Defendant:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
AHMED v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04888
Plaintiff:
ISLAM AHMED
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rusanov et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv02830
Plaintiff:
IGOR RUSANOV and MARIA CHORNEY
Defendant:
Aledandro Mayorkas, UR M JADDOU, TED H. KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ilboudo v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv04683
Plaintiff:
Razangwende Jean Modeste Ilboudo
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou, Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
