Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Planned Parenthood of AR, etc., et al v. Cindy Gillespie
as 16-4068
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, doing business as Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Jane Does, 1-3
Defendant - Appellant:
Cindy Gillespie, Director of the Arkansas Department of Human Services
Planned Parenthood AR, etc., et al v. John Selig
as 15-3271
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Planned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, doing business as Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Jane Does, 1-3
Defendant - Appellant:
John M. Selig, Director, Arkansas Department of Human Services, in his official capacity
Dr. Larry Lytle v. Health and Human Services, et al
as 14-3715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dr. Larry Lytle
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Tyra Wisecup, Chief and others
Dr. Larry Lytle v. Health and Human Services, et al
as 14-1085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dr. Larry Lytle
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Tyra Wisecup, Chief and others
Francisco Munoz, etc., et al v. Julie Myers, etc., et al
as 08-2528
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Francisco Munoz, both individually and as "next friend" for one minor child, I.M., Albis Munoz, Saomara Munoz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hilario Arias, Dulce Maria Hernandez Arias, David Corea and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Julie L. Myers, Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, John P. Torres, Director of Detention and Removal Operations, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Scott Baniecke, St. Paul Field Office Director for Detention and Removal Operations and others
Defendant:
John Doe, ICE Agents ##1-30, Dan Hartog, Kandiyohi County Sheriff, Jane Doe, Kandiyohi County Probational Official and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
