Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Kristi Noem, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 21-2542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Governor Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Dakota and South Dakota
Defendant / Appellee:
Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Shannon A. Estenoz, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity as acting Director and Deputy Director of Operations of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Appellant:
State of Kansas, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Bonnie Miller, et al v. John Thurston
as 20-2095
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Robert William Allen, Bonnie Heather Miller, Adella Dozier Gray and others
Defendant / Appellant:
John Thurston, in his official capacity as Secretary of State of Arkansas
Appellant:
State of Arizona, State of Alaska, Honest Elections Project and others
In Re: Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 20-1791
Petitioner:
State of Tennessee, State of Kentucky, Marie Holder, in her official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Diversified Ingredients v. Joseph Testa
as 16-2791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Diversified Ingredients, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph W. Testa, Ohio State Tax Commissioner, Ohio Department of Taxation
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc., et al
as 15-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly situated persons
Defendant - Appellee:
Medtox Scientific, Inc., Medtox Laboratories, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Medtox Scientific, Inc., et al
as 14-8019
Petitioner:
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, individually and as the representative of a class of similarly-situated persons
Respondent:
Medtox Scientific, Inc., Medtox Laboratories, Inc. and John Does 1-10
State of Nebraska, et al v. US Dept. of HHS, et al
as 12-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Nebraska, by and through, Jon C. Bruning, Attorney General of the State of Nebraska, State of South Carolina, by and through, Alan Wilson, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, State of Texas, by and through, Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas and others
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Treasury and others
United States v. Cargill, Incorporated
as 10-2792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Ohio, State of Indiana, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Cargill, Incorporated
United States v. Cargill, Incorporated
as 10-2732
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
State of Ohio, State of Indiana, State of North Dakota and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Cargill, Incorporated
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
