Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stacey Johnson, et al v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 21-1965
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Zachariah Marcyniuk, Brandon E. Lacy, Andrew Sasser and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terrick Terrell Nooner, Bruce Earl Ward, Don William Davis and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction and Asa Hutchinson, Governor of the State of Arkansas, in his official capacity
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Dewayne Williams, Marcel Wayne Williams, Jack Harold Jones, Jr. and others
Teresa Bloodman v. AR Supreme Court Committee, et al
as 19-1771
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Stark Ligon, Jr., Executive Director, Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct, in his official capacity and individual capacity, Karolyn Jones, Member, Panel A, Committee on Professional Conduct, James Dunham, Chair, Committee on Professional Conduct and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Teresa Lynette Bloodman
In Re: Honorable John Kemp, et al
as 18-1864
Petitioner:
In re: Honorable John Dan Kemp, Honorable Robin F. Wynne, Honorable Courtney Hudson-Goodson and others
Erin R. Kemp v. U.S. Department of Education
as 17-6032
Debtor:
In re: Erin R. Kemp, also known as Erin R. Guinn, also known as Erin R. Griffin
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Erin R. Kemp
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Education
United States v. Curtis Kemp
as 16-3632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Curtis Lee Kemp
Jimmy Hendrich, et al v. Medtronic, et al
as 14-8029
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Jimmy Hendrich, Loretta Ann Hendrich, Karen Klaseus and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. and others
United States v. John MacInnis
as 09-2710
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
John Kemp MacInnis
United States v. Robert Kemp
as 07-2620
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Clay Kemp
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
