Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Michael Tucker, et al v. General Motors LLC
as 21-2698
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Tucker and Robert Riddle, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
General Motors LLC
Dathan Jackson v. General Motors
as 20-2585
Defendant:
Anil Grupta
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dathan Jackson
Defendant / Appellee:
General Motors, LLC
William Hughes v. General Motors
as 19-2634
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William C. Hughes
Defendant / Appellee:
General Motors
Richard Barcomb v. General Motors LLC
as 19-1870
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Barcomb
Defendant / Appellee:
General Motors, LLC
Richard Barcomb v. General Motors LLC
as 19-1350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Barcomb
Defendant / Appellee:
General Motors LLC
James Gretter v. Gretter Autoland, Inc., et al
as 16-3490
Debtor:
In re: Gretter Autoland, Inc.
Appellant:
James M. Gretter
Appellee:
Gretter Autoland, Inc., General Motors Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Trustee:
Robert Schlegel
James Gretter v. Gretter Autoland, Inc., et al
as 16-3490
Debtor:
In re: Gretter Autoland, Inc.
Appellant:
James M. Gretter
Appellee:
Gretter Autoland, Inc., General Motors Company, Ford Motor Company and others
Trustee:
Robert Schlegel
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant / Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Craftsmen Limousine, et al v. Ford Motor Company, et al
as 08-2214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Craftsmen Limousine, INC. and JMRL Sales & Service, INC., a Missouri Corporation, doing business as Craftsmen Limousine
Defendant - Appellee:
Ford Motor Company, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
General Motors Corporation, a Missouri corporation, Cadillac, a division or affilate of General Motors Corporation, Limo, an association of limousine builders and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
