Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sprint Communications Company v. Native American Telecom, LLC
as 16-3589
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Defendant:
Crow Creek Sioux Tribal Court and B.J. Jones, in his official capacity as special judge of Tribal Court
Defendant - Appellant:
Native American Telecom, LLC
Sprint Communications Co. v. Elizabeth Jacobs, et al
as 16-1417
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
Elizabeth S. Jacobs, Nick Wagner and Sheila K. Tipton, in their officail capacity as members of the Iowa Utilities Board
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
Windstream Iowa Communications, Inc. and Office of Consumer Advocate
Sprint Communications Company, et al v. Mary Wynne, et al
as 15-2954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Communications, Inc., formerly known as Sprint Nextel Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
Mary Wynne, in her official capacity as Chief Judge of the Oglala Sioux Tribal Court, Oglala Sioux Tribe Utilities Commission, Joe Red Cloud and others
Sprint Communications Co. v. Elizabeth S. Jacobs, et al
as 14-3109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert B. Berntsen, Krista Tanner and Darrell Hanson, in his official capacity as a member of the Iowa Utilities Board
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee:
Windstream Iowa Communications, Inc. and Office of Consumer Advocate
Sprint Communications Co. v. Robert Berntsen, et al
as 11-2984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert B. Berntsen, Krista Tanner and Darrell Hanson, in his official capacity as a member of the Iowa Utilities Board
IA Telecommunications Services, et al v. Iowa Utilities Board, et al
as 08-2140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Iowa Telecommunications Services, Inc., doing business as Iowa Telecom
Plaintiff:
Citizens Mutual Telephone Cooperative, Clear Lake Independent Telephone Company, Farmers Mutual Cooperative Telephone Co. of Shelby and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Iowa Utilities Board, Utilities Division, Department of Commerce, John Norris, In his official capacity as a member of the Iowa Utilities Board and not as an Individual, Diane Munns, In her Official Capacity as a member of the Iowa Utilities Board and not as an Individual and others
Southwestern Bell Telephone v. NuVox Communications of MO, et al
as 06-3727
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., doing business as SBC Missouri
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Public Service Commission, Jeff Davis, Connie Murray and others
Defendant:
Birch Telecom of Missouri, Inc., Ionex Communications, Inc., Charter Fiberlink-Missouri, LLC and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Verizon New England, Incorporated, Verizon New York, Incorporated, Verizon Pennsylvania, Incorporated and others
Southwestern Bell Telephone v. Ionex Communications, et al
as 06-3726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., doing business as SBC Missouri
Defendant - Appellant:
Missouri Public Service Commission, Jeff Davis, Connie Murray and others
Defendant:
Big River Telephone Company, LLC, Birch Telecom of Missouri, Inc., Ionex Communications, Inc. and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Verizon New England, Incorporated, Verizon New York, Incorporated, Verizon Pennsylvania, Incorporated and others
Southwestern Bell Telephone v. NuVox Communications of MO, et al
as 06-3701
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P., doing business as SBC Missouri
Defendant:
Missouri Public Service Commission, Jeff Davis, Connie Murray and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Big River Telephone Company, LLC, NuVox Communications of Missouri, Inc., Socket Telecom, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sprint Communications Company, L.P.
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee:
Verizon New England, Incorporated, Verizon New York, Incorporated, Verizon Pennsylvania, Incorporated and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
