Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Michelle Baker v. Cenlar FSB, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 22-2310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michelle A. Baker
Defendant / Appellee:
Cenlar Federal Savings Bank, Mr. Stephen W. Gozdan, Chief Financial Officer
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc. and Christian Bank & Trust, as Trustee for Securitized Trust CitiGroup Mortgage Loan Trust, Inc. 2015-PSI Trust, Mortgage Electronic Registration System ("MERS")
David White v. CitiMortgage, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 16-2599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David L. White
Defendant - Appellee:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
The County of Ramsey, et al v. MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-3026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
The County of Ramsey and The County of Hennepin, on behalf of themselves and all other Minnesota counties
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America Corporation and others
Yang Thao-Xiong v. American Mortgage Corporation, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yang Mee Thao-Xiong
Defendant - Appellee:
American Mortgage Corporation, CitiMortgage, Inc. and Usset, Weingarden and Liebo, P.L.L.P., and also all other persons, unknown claiming any right, title, estate, interest, or lien in the real estate described in the complaint herein
Andrew McGlory, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 13-2513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrew McGlory and Carmita McGlory
Defendant - Appellee:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Usset, Weingarden and Liebo, P.L.L.P., Peterson, Fram & Bergman, P.A. and others
Jackson County Missouri v. MERSCORP, Inc., et al
as 13-1341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jackson County Missouri, by and through W. Stephen Nixon, Jackson County Counselor
Defendant - Appellee:
MERSCORP, Inc., Now known as MERSCORP Holdings, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Bank of America N.A. and others
Mayme Brown v. Mortgage Electronic, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-3494
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mayme Brown, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Circuit Clerkof Hot Spring County, Arkansas, and on behalf of all Circuit Clerks in the State of Arkansas
Defendant - Appellee:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , A Delaware Corporation, MERSCORP, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Sylvia Adorno, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sylvia Adorno, Todd Eberhardy, Lloyd C. Loftus and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP, Inc. and others
Purnie Peterson, et al v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 12-2530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Purnie Ray Peterson, Matthew R. Jaakola, Kristin M. Jaakola and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP, Inc. and others
Stephen LaBrant, et al v. Mortgage Electronic, et al
as 12-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Stephen A. LaBrant and Lisa M. LaBrant
Defendant - Appellee:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Prime Mortgage Corporation, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.