Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Kristi Noem, et al v. Deb Haaland, et al
as 21-2542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Governor Kristi Noem, in her official capacity as the Governor of South Dakota and South Dakota
Defendant / Appellee:
Deb Haaland, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of the Interior, Shannon A. Estenoz, in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Fish and Wildlife and Parks, Shawn Benge, in his official capacity as acting Director and Deputy Director of Operations of the National Park Service and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Vance and Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
Appellant:
State of Kansas, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Madeline Pavek, et al v. Donald Trump for President, et al
as 20-2410
Not Yet Classified:
National Republican Congressional Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Republican National Committee and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Madeline Pavek, DSCC, Ethan Sykes and others
Defendant:
Steve Simon, In his official capacity as the Minnesota Secretary of State
Appellant:
Honest Elections Project, State of Texas, State of West Virginia and others
In Re: Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 20-1791
Petitioner:
State of Tennessee, State of Kentucky, Marie Holder, in her official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Ian Pollard, et al v. Lewis M. Frost, et al
as 17-1818
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ian Pollard
Defendant - Appellee:
Remington Arms Company, LLC, Sporting Goods Properties, Inc. and E.I. Du Pont Nemours and Company
Objector:
Terry Pennington and Rodney Townsend
Objector - Appellant:
Lewis M. Frost and Richard Denney
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellant(s):
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee(s):
State of Alabama, State of Arkansas, State of Louisiana and others
West Virginia Pipe Trades, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 15-3468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund, Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii and Union Asset Management Holding AG
Defendant - Appellee:
Medtronic, Inc., William A. Hawkins, Gary L. Ellis and others
Chemical Valley Pension Fund, et al v. Express Scripts, Inc., et al
as 10-2772
:
In re: Express Scripts, Inc. Securities Litigation, Class Action
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, MARTA/ATU Local 732 Employees Retirement Plan, SEIU Pension Plans Master Trust and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Express Scripts, Inc., Barrett A. Toan, Edward J. Tenholder and others
Keith Smith, et al v. Bayer Corporation
as 09-1069
:
In re: Baycol Products Litigation
Plaintiff:
Peggy Ann Mays and George F. McCollins, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent - Appellant:
Keith Smith and Shirley Sperlazza
Defendant - Appellee:
Bayer Corporation, a foreign corporation, authorized to do business in West Virginia as Bayer Corporation, and also known as Bayer AG and Bayer Pharmaceutical
Defendant:
Bayer AG, a foreign corporation, GlaxoSmithKline, a foreign corporation, GlaxoSmithKline PLC, a foreign corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
