Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 357
Timothy Carroll v. Norfolk Regional Center, et al
as 21-3707
Plaintiff / Appellant: Timothy Joseph Carroll
Defendant / Appellee: Norfolk Regional Center, Rosetta McAllister, RN, Tom Barr, Manager and others
Mario Ortiz, et al v. Ferrellgas Partners, et al
as 21-8010
Not Classified By Court: In re: In Re: Pre -Filled Propane Tank Antitrust Litigation
Petitioner: Mario Ortiz, Stephen Morrison, Steven Tseffos and others
Plaintiff: Sean Venezia, Michael S. Harvey, Gregory Ludvigsen and others
Respondent: Ferrellgas Partners, L.P., a limited partnership, Ferrellgas, L.P., a limited partnership, doing business as Blue Rhino and UGI Corporation, a corporation
Estate of James Earl Turner v. Vernon Morris, et al
as 21-3657
Plaintiff / Appellant: Estate of James Earl Turner, Lauren Turner Boyd as co-personal representative, Estate of James Earl Turner, Deceased
Defendant: Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and Arkansas Association of Counties
Defendant / Appellee: Vernon Morris, Sheriff Calhoun County, individually and in his official capacity as Calhoun County Sheriff, Jarad Hennegan, individually and in his official capacity as Calhoun County Jail Administrator, Tom Turner, individually and in his official capacity as an agent of the Calhoun County Sheriff's Department and others
Emily Davis v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3526
Plaintiff / Appellee: Emily Davis
Defendant: City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities and Charlene Deeken
Defendant / Appellant: Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Shavelle Chavez-Nelson v. Gov. Mark Dayton, et al
as 21-3173
Petitioner / Appellant: Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson
Respondent / Appellee: Governor Mark Dayton and Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
Dillan Newbold v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellee: Dillan Newbold
Defendant: City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Terrence Ruffin and others
Defendant / Appellant: Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual an official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, T., in his individual and official capacities and others
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of Missouri, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as the Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and others
Thomas Styczinski, et al v. Grace Arnold
as 21-2936
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas John Styczinski, Tom "The Coin Guy, LLC, Treasure Island Coins, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee: Grace Arnold, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Commerce
David Schied v. United States, et al
as 21-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant: David Schied, one of the Sovereign American People, a totally and permanently disabled RECENT QUAD-AMPUTEE, CRIME VICTIM, Common Law and Civil Rights sui juris GRIEVANT/CLAIMANT/BENEFICIARY (BENEFICIARY/RELATOR)
Defendant / Appellee: United States of America, Donald Trump, in his public capacity as former U.S. PRESIDENT for the UNITED STATES, Denise Paige Hood, in her private capacity and public capacity as "chief judge" for the USDCEDM and others
Victor Fields v. Ashlee Berts, et al
as 21-2087
Defendant / Appellee: Office Special Investigators-OSI, Lieutenant Watrin, MCF-Rush City, Individual and Official Capacity, Heather Emerson, or Nelson Registered Nurse, MCF-Rush City, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Victor Fields

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?