Cases 61 - 70 of 393
United States v. Philip Maccani
as 21-2642
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Philip Maccani, also known as Phillip Maccani
Thomas Bell v. Attorney General of S. Dakota, et al
as 21-2555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Phillip Bell
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney General of South Dakota, Judge John L. Brown and Hughes Co. Jail
Thomas Bell v. Dural Gross, et al
as 21-2422
Defendant / Appellee:
SD Teen Court, Pierre, SD, Kiah Marshall, Hughes Co. Jail and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Thomas Phillip Bell
Thomas Bell v. John Brown, et al
as 21-2290
Respondent / Appellee:
Hughes Co. Jail, Judge John L. Brown and Attorney General of South Dakota
Petitioner / Appellant:
Thomas Phillip Bell, also known as John Doe
Jason Hanley v. Chairman Don Phillips
as 21-2219
Respondent / Appellee:
Chairman Don Phillips
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jason Hanley
Mark Bitzan v. Jerry Bartruff, et al
as 21-2078
Defendant / Appellee:
Jill Johnson, ISP Administrative Assistant, Bradley Hoenig, ISP Segretation Committee, Jay Nelson, IDOC Religious Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Bitzan
Defendant:
Debbie Nichols, ISP Former A/W Security, Jane Doe, ISP Mailroom, Julie Johnson, ISP Former A/W Administration and others
John Gipson v. Randy Gibbs, et al
as 21-2070
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Oliver Gipson
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Eaves and Randy Gibbs, Warden
Darrell Woods v. John Eckenrode, et al
as 21-1905
Defendant / Appellee:
John Thaddeus Eckenrode, Attorney at Law, Carol Wilson, SCCC Caseworker, Cody Bryant, SCCC Caseworker and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Woods
Nacy Phillips v. Crisp Contractors
as 21-1418
Defendant / Appellee:
Crisp Contractors
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Nacy Phillips
Douglas Hahn v. Western MO Correctional Center, et al
as 21-1360
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown House Caseworkers, Missouri Department of Corrections, D. Pratt, CM II and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Douglas Hahn
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
