Cases 11 - 20 of 64
United States v. James Hawkins
as 20-3389
Defendant / Appellant:
James Hawkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. James Hawkins
as 20-1063
Defendant / Appellant:
James Hawkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
United States v. James Hawkins
as 20-1061
Defendant / Appellant:
James Hawkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Johnny Banks v. Shelby Hawkins
as 19-3092
Defendant:
City of Shannon Hills
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Johnny Banks
Defendant / Appellant:
Shelby Hawkins
Dequan Hawkins v. Jeff Norman
as 19-3098
Respondent / Appellee:
Jeff Norman
Petitioner / Appellant:
Dequan A. Hawkins
Darren Reagan v. Arturo Rendon, et al
as 19-2923
Defendant:
Corey Minor, Education Department, FCC Forrest City, John F. Caraway, FBOP/South Central Regional Office, Jason A. Sickler, Regional Counsel, FBOP/South Central Regional Office and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Carmillia Chatters, DHO Hearing Officer, FCC-Forrest City (originally named C. Chatters) and Arturo Rendon, Counselor, FCC Forrest City
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darren L. Reagan
Anthony Hayes v. Mitchell Johnson, Jr., et al
as 19-2915
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Deputy Director, ADC, Terrie L. Banister, Disciplinary Hearing Judge, ADC, Randy Watson, Warden, Wrightsville Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anthony Hayes
United States v. James Hawkins
as 19-2306
Defendant / Appellant:
James Hawkins
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
West Virginia Pipe Trades, et al v. Medtronic, Inc., et al
as 15-3468
Plaintiff - Appellant:
West Virginia Pipe Trades Health & Welfare Fund, Employees' Retirement System of the State of Hawaii and Union Asset Management Holding AG
Defendant - Appellee:
Medtronic, Inc., William A. Hawkins, Gary L. Ellis and others
United States v. Terrence Hawkin
as 15-1894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Terrence Lamar Hawkins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
