Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Robert Dupree, Sr. v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 19-2990
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas and City of Little Rock, Code Enforcement
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert E. Dupree, Sr.
Johnathan Pinney v. Chris Waring, et al
as 19-2173
Defendant / Appellee:
Chad Brown, State's Attorney, Lucas Emberton, Sheriff, Van Buren County, Dallas Clark, Code Enforcement Officer, Fairfield Bay and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Johnathan Pinney
Sandra Harrilal, et al v. Steve Magner, et al
as 09-1579
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sandra Harrilal and Steven R. Johnson, doing business as Market Group and Properties
Plaintiff:
Bee Vue and Lamena Vue
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Magner, individually and as a supervisor of City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, Michael Kalis, individually and as a code enforcement officer of City of St. Paul, Dick Lippert, individually and as a code enforcement officer of the City of St. Paul and others
Frank Steinhauser, III, et al v. City of St. Paul, etc., et al
as 09-1528
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frank J. Steinhauser, III, Mark E. Meysembourg and Kelly G. Brisson
Defendant - Appellee:
City of St. Paul, a municipal corporation, Randy Kelly, individually and as Mayor of City of St. Paul, Andy Dawkins, individually and as Director of City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement and others
Thomas J. Gallagher, et al v. Steve Magner, et al
as 09-1209
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Thomas J. Gallagher, Joseph J. Collins, Sr., Dadder's Properties, LLC and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Steve Magner, individually and as a supervisor of City of St. Paul's Department of Neighborhood Housing and Property Improvement, Mike Cassidy, individually and as a code enforcement officer of the City of St. Paul, Joel Essling, individually and as a code enforcement officer of the City of St. Paul and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
