Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hoy v. Premier Health Insurance of Iowa, LLC
as 4:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Toby Hoy
Defendant:
Premier Health Insurance of Iowa, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hoy v. VantageCare Insurance LLC
as 4:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Toby Hoy
Defendant:
VantageCare Insurance LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 FCC-Unsolicited Telephone Sales
Hoy v. SmartScripts, LLC
as 3:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Toby Hoy
Defendant:
SmartScripts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Steven Bell v. Gene Beasley, et al
as 20-3250
Defendant / Appellee:
Brenda Hoy, Medical Administrator, Forrest City Medium (originally named as Hoyt), Curiel, Counselor, Smith, Unit Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Bell
Eddie Jones v. Dewayne Hendrix, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 20-1454
Defendant / Appellee:
Forrest City Medical Center, Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Does, 1-20 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Jones
Guy Wheelock v. Sheryl Phillips, et al
as 20-1242
Defendant / Appellee:
J. F. Caraway, RD, Federal Bureau of Prisons - South Central Regional Office, Gene Beasley, Warden, Forrest City Low, John Does, 1-2 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Guy Edward Wheelock
William Ramsey v. Michelle Wingo, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Lewis Ramsey
Defendant:
Breeding, Officer, Forrest City Low, B. Hoy, AHSA, Forrest City Low, C. Jones, Officer, Forrest City Low and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michelle Wingo, Physician Assistant, Forrest City Correction Complex and Does, Scheduling Committee for Medical Procedures, Forrest City Correction Complex
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.