Cases 81 - 90 of 1,125
Iris Quezada-Liborio v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1321
Petitioner:
Iris Quezada-Liborio
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Nguyen Huynh v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1318
Petitioner:
Nguyen Chi Cuong Nmn Huynh
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Wasia Maya v. Merrick B. Garland, et al
as 23-1305
Petitioner:
Wasia Kessi Maya
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Not Classified By Court:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, Tae D. Johnson, Acting Director U.S. ICE, Henry Lucero, U.S. ICE Director Chicago Field Office and others
Ada Rivas-Ramos v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1202
Petitioner:
Ada Merary Rivas-Ramos
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Marco Reyes Arias v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1185
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Reyes Arias
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Moudjahed Ferchichi, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1123
Petitioner:
Moudjahed Ferchichi, Abderrazal Ferchichi, Nacereddine Ferchichi and others
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Rigoberto Flores-Romero v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1082
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Flores-Romero
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Marvin Garcia-Zelaya v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1085
Petitioner:
Marvin Marcelino Garcia-Zelaya
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States of America
Simon Quito-Guachichulca v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1069
Petitioner:
Simon Gavino Quito-Guachichulca
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Miguel Pascual-Miguel, et al v. Merrick B. Garland
as 23-1072
Petitioner:
Miguel Pascual-Miguel and E.G.P.M.
Respondent:
Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
