Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 91 - 100 of 26,318
Bradford v. Asian Health Services
as 24-3702
Plaintiff: IRA BRADFORD, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES
Bullivant v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al.
as 24-3693
Petitioner: MELANIE BULLIVANT
Respondent: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and RANDY MOORE, United States Forest Service Chief
Hall v. Estrada, et al.
as 24-3683
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: US Attorney MARTIN ESTRADA, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
United States of America v. Boucher
as 24-3674
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: MARK J. BOUCHER
Hedges v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3687
Plaintiff: CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID A. HUBBART, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
United States of America v. Contreras-Ramirez
as 24-3677
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RODRIGO CONTRERAS-RAMIREZ
Flores v. Garland, et al.
as 24-3656
Plaintiff: JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Defendant: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
United States of America v. Salcedo
as 24-3651
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOEL SALCEDO
United States of America v. Boylan
as 24-3663
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JERRY NEHL BOYLAN
Tohono O'odham Nation, et al. v. United States Department of the Interior, et al.
as 24-3659
Plaintiff: TOHONO O'ODHAM NATION, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, ARCHAEOLOGY SOUTHWEST and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT
Intervenor: SUNZIA TRANSMISSION, LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?