Cases 11 - 20 of 126
Race v. Montana State Prison Infirmary, et al.
as 24-38
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL SIDNEY RACE
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTANA STATE PRISON INFIRMARY, PAUL REES, Dr. NEUMEISTER and others
Miller, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 23-2979
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JAMES MILLER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE, WENDY HAUFFEN and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in their official capacity, ALLISON MENDOZA, In their official capacity, BRENT ORRICK, in his official capacity as Director of the Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms and others
Peterson v. Sutter Medical Foundation, et al.
as 23-2911
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH PETERSON, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUTTER MEDICAL FOUNDATION, SUTTER BAY HOSPITALS, DBA ALTA BATES SUMMIT MEDICAL CENTER, EDEN MEDICAL CENTER and others
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Crossfirst Bank, et al v. Vieste SPE LLC, et al
as 23-80038
Petitioner:
CROSSFIRST BANK, a Kansas banking corporation, CROSSFIRST INVESTMENTS INCORPORATED, MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation and others
Respondent:
VIESTE SPE LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, VIESTE ENERGY LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, VIESTE LLC, an Indiana limited liability company and others
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55413
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC and ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC
Defendant:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Appellee:
CALPRIVATE BANK
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
USSEC, et al v. Chicago Title Company, et al
as 23-55252
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Appellant:
KIM H. PETERSON, individually, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated April 14, 1992, and as Trustee of the Peterson Family Trust dated September 29, 1983, KIM FUNDING, LLC and ABC FUNDING STRATEGIES, LLC
Defendant:
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY and CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Not Classified By Court:
NOSSAMAN LLP and MARCO COSTALES
Receiver:
KRISTA FREITAG, Receiver for ANI Development, LLC, American National Investments, Inc., and their subsidiaries and affiliates
Daniel Crowe, et al v. Oregon State Bar, et al
as 23-35193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL Z. CROWE and OREGON CIVIL LIBERTIES ATTORNEYS, an Oregon nonprofit corporation
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE K. PETERSON I
Defendant / Appellee:
OREGON STATE BAR, a Public Corporation, OREGON STATE BAR BOARD OF GOVERNORS, VANESSA A. NORDYKE, President of the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors and others
United States of America v. Peterson
as 23-323
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TITUS DION PETERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
