Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 547
Uhuru v. Bonnifield, et al.
as 24-775
Plaintiff: KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant: JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manager, individual and official capacity, JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, individual and official capacity, H. WARREN ALDERSON, and Predecessor, Protestant Chaplain, individual and official capacity and others
Hill v. Diaz, et al.
as 24-450
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN T. HILL
Defendant / Appellee: RALPH DIAZ, JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manag., official capacity and individual capacity, B. LAYES, Office Technician, official and individual capacity and others
Smith, et al. v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-70
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW JAMES SMITH, PAUL CALLEN, KATHY POWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee: TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Bong v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene
as 23-4467
Petitioner: JILL BONG
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Not Classified By Court: KATE BROWN, in both her individual and official capacity as Governor of the State of Oregon, RACHAEL BANKS, in both her individual and official capacity as Public Health Director of Oregon Health Authority, STEVE WOODS, in both his individual and official capacity as Superintendent of Douglas County School District 15 ("the School") and others
Robinson v. Washington Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, et al.
as 23-4127
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHARON ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee: WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION, EMERALD QUEEN CASINO AND HOTEL, MISTY, Human Resources, Emerald Queen and others
UMB Bank & Trust, National Association v. Harvest Gold Silica, Inc., et al.
as 23-3911
Not Yet Classified: UMB BANK & TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, HARVEST GOLD SILICA, INC., a Wyoming corporation, GREENWICH INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: VAST MOUNTAIN DEVELOPMENT, INC., a Nevada corporation
Defendant: SOLID GOLD, INC., a Wyoming corporation, AMERICAN RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation, CLAYTON ROLLINS and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. United States Bureau of Land Management, et al.
as 23-3624
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, GREENPEACE, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Casa Libre Freedom House, et al. v. Mayorkas, et al.
as 23-2858
Plaintiff / Appellee: CASA LIBRE FREEDOM HOUSE, EL RESCATE, CLERGY AND LAITY UNITED FOR ECONOMIC JUSTICE and others
Defendant / Appellant: ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZPIn re: Ben Toma, et al v. USDC-AZP We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-70179
Not Classified By Court: In re: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official Capacity, WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, in his official capacity, MI FAMILIA VOTA and others
Petitioner: BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, in his official capacity
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Joyce Burrus v. USDA, et al
as 23-16203
Plaintiff / Appellant: JOYCE M. BURRUS
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, VICTORIA CHRISTIANSEN, Chief and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?