Cases 31 - 40 of 97,978
Pritchett v. Oliver, et al.
as 24-3613
Petitioner:
SHAWN PRITCHETT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, RONALD OLIVER and JO GENTRY
Sullivan v. Attorney General of the State of Montana
as 24-3628
Petitioner:
RYAN PATRICK SULLIVAN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Standley v. Attorney General of the State of Montana
as 24-3638
Petitioner:
DONNIE STANDLEY, Donnie Lee Stanley, Donnie Stanley and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Estrada-Marroquin v. Garland
as 24-3612
Petitioner:
RENE ALEXANDER ESTRADA-MARROQUIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ball v. Citibank, N.A.
as 24-3640
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. BALL
Defendant:
CITIBANK, N.A., a New York Corporation, dba Sears Shop Your Way
Schmidt v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
as 24-3617
Petitioner:
KORIE SCHMIDT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Interested Party:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Chinook Indian Nation, et al. v. Haaland, et al.
as 24-3629
Plaintiff:
CHINOOK INDIAN NATION, an Indian Tribe and a Washington non-profit corporation, and as successor-in-interest to The Lower Band of Chinook Indians, ANTHONY A. JOHNSON, individually and in his capacity as Chairman of the Chinook Indian Nation and CONFEDERATED LOWER CHINOOK TRIBES AND BANDS
Defendant:
DEB HAALAND, in her capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Interior, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, OFFICE OF FEDERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT and others
Estate of Ian Simmers v. King County - State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3636
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF IAN SIMMERS, by and through administrator Donna Berube
Defendant:
KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, CITY OF BOTHELL, EDWARD J. HOPKINS, Detective and others
First Interstate Bank v. Wall Street Apartments LLC
as 24-3641
Plaintiff:
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK
Defendant:
WALL STREET APARTMENTS LLC
Appellant:
ALAA ELKHARWILY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
