Cases 41 - 50 of 362
Medina Abrego, et al. v. Garland
as 22-1094
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDGARDO MEDINA ABREGO and WILLIAM ANTONIO MEDINA REYES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Jonathan Medina
as 22-50143
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN HERNANDEZ MEDINA
Jose Medina v. United Airlines, Inc
as 22-80058
Respondent:
JOSE MEDINA, as an individual and on behalf of all aggrieved employees
Petitioner:
UNITED AIRLINES, INC, a Delaware Corporation
USA v. Miguel Cruz-Medina
as 22-10144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MIGUEL CRUZ-MEDINA, AKA Miguel Cruz
USA v. Angello Medina
as 22-50119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGELLO STEVEN MEDINA
USA v. Jose Cruz-Delgado
as 22-30084
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS CRUZ-DELGADO, AKA Salvador Rosas-Medina
Jeffrey Sulitzer, et al v. Joseph Tippins, et al
as 20-55735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SMILEDIRECTCLUB, LLC, a Tennesse limited liability company and JEFFREY SULITZER, D.M.D., an individual and a California Professional Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
YVETTE CHAPPELL-INGRAM, MPA, in their official capacities as Officers and/or Members of the Dental Board of California, FRAN BURTON, M.S.W., in her official capacity as a Member of the Dental Board of California, JOSEPH TIPPINS, individuals and others
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Medina-Castellanos v. Garland
as 22-659
Petitioner:
FERNANDO MEDINA-CASTELLANOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Segura-Medina v. Garland
as 21-1277
Petitioner:
LUIS MANUEL SEGURA-MEDINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gaspar Medina v. Jeff Lynch
as 21-56300
Petitioner / Appellant:
GASPAR MEDINA
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFF LYNCH, Acting Warden of CSP-Sacramento
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
