Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 97,861
Ramirez-Sandoval, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3456
Petitioner: BEGLY LIZETH RAMIREZ-SANDOVAL, CHELSEA KAROL DE LEON RAMIREZ and YARA ALESSANDRA DE LEON RAMIREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Depape
as 24-3458
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DAVID WAYNE DEPAPE
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson, et al.
as 24-3459
Plaintiff: MANUEL EUGENE SHOTWELL
Defendant: CHAVEZ-EPPERSON, DELANEY, E. MEDINA and others
Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3460
Plaintiff: IVAN RENE MOORE
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, ASSET RELIANCE, INC. and others
Young, et al. v. The Allstate Corporation, et al.
as 24-3462
Plaintiff: WILLIAM YOUNG, a California citizen and KELLY YOUNG, a California citizen
Defendant: THE ALLSTATE CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation: Erroneously Sued as Allstate Insurance Company and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
Hafner v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-3483
Plaintiff: ERIC HAFNER
Defendant: JOSEPH M. LOMBARDO, Nevada Governor, AARON FORD, Nevada Attorney General and FRANCISCO V. AGUILAR, Nevada Secretary of State
Koch v. City of Spokane, et al.
as 24-3485
Plaintiff: MARK A. KOCH
Defendant: CITY OF SPOKANE, a Municipality and SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, a Municipality
Carter v. Thornell
as 24-3461
Petitioner: JARRETT C. CARTER
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION
Lizarraga, et al. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited, et al.
as 24-3463
Plaintiff: DANIEL LIZARRAGA, CARLOS DADA, SERGIO ARAUZ and others
Defendant: NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and Q CYBER TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
United States of America v. Peterson
as 24-3482
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: DEVIN LEE PETERSON

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?