Cases 31 - 40 of 170
USA v. Straughn Gorman, et al
as 15-16694
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
STRAUGHN SAMUEL GORMAN
Defendant:
$167,070.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR FORFEITURE REFORM
USA v. Nextgear Capital, Inc., et al
as 15-56280
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
NEXTGEAR CAPITAL, INC.
Defendant:
ONE 2006 LAMBORGHINI MURCIELAGO
USA v. $11,052.00 In U.S. Currency
as 15-56251
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$11,052.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH LAMAR SPRATT, AKA Ken Sparks
USA v. Straughn Gorman, et al
as 15-16600
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellee:
STRAUGHN SAMUEL GORMAN
Defendant:
$167,070.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS FOR FORFEITURE REFORM
Chike Okafor v. USA
as 14-17087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHIKE OKAFOR
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Hodson Broadcasting, et al
as 14-17023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HODSON BROADCASTING and RICHARD DEAN HODSON, sole proprietor of Hodson Broadcasting
USA v. Santiago Cruz, et al
as 14-16936
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
SANTIAGO CRUZ
Defendant:
$102,836.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Jeffrey McMeel v. United States, et al
as 14-35813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY MARK MCMEEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE COMMISSIONER
USA v. Charles Guerrero, et al
as 14-35717
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant - Appellant:
CHARLES GUERRERO
Defendant:
$11,500.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, in rem and $2,971.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, in rem
USA v. Efren Gallegos-Raymundo, et al
as 14-35662
Claimant - Appellant:
EFREN GALLEGOS-RAYMUNDO
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$46,150.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, more or less, and all proceeds therefrom
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
