Cases 81 - 90 of 520
George Larin v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15502
Petitioner / Appellant:
GEORGE BENJAMIN LARIN
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Tony Deng v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15480
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONY DENG
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Edward Moss v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15375
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD PAUL MOSS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Edward Moss v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15376
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD PAUL MOSS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Eslyn Villa-Inzunza v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15309
Petitioner / Appellant:
ESLYN ADRIAN VILLA-INZUNZA, also known as Eslyn Adrian Villa
Respondent / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Douglas Coulson v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15245
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS ARNOLD COULSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
John Sochor v. Kenneth Bradshaw, et al
as 22-15224
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN GABRIEL SOCHOR
Respondent / Appellee:
KENNETH BRADSHAW and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Martico Muldrow v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 22-15222
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTICO A. MULDROW
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Joshua Villalobos v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 22-15213
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSHUA IDLEFONSO VILLALOBOS
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA and DAVID SHINN, Director
Arthur Thomas v. David Shinn, et al
as 22-15192
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR TRUMAN THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
