Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Elizabeth Carley v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-16965
Petitioner / Appellant:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, JERRY HOWELL, Warden and CHARLES DANIELS, Director, Nevada Department of Corrections
Respondent:
NDOC/FMWCC and JO GENTRY, Warden
Ana Ocegueda v. State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15759
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANA OCEGUEDA
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, JO GENTRY, Warden, FMWCC, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO and others
Ricardo Irive v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 18-15925
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO IRIVE
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Ricardo Irive v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 18-15927
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO IRIVE
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Kenneth Hendren v. Brian Williams, et al
as 18-15642
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH A. HENDREN
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JO GENTRY, Warden
Jamaar Williams v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-17442
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMAAR JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Alisha Murphy v. Amanda Gentry
as 17-35944
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALISHA ANN MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
AMANDA GENTRY
Steven Scott v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 17-17312
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN L. SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JO GENTRY, Warden
Michael Moe v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-17204
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN MOE
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden, Substituted for Brian E. Williams, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Todd Leavitt v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-16698
Petitioner - Appellant:
TODD MITCHELL LEAVITT
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
