Civil Rights Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Dante Pattison v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 23-15066
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANTE HANALEI PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN SANDOVAL, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, PETERSON, Doctor; 32 - suggestion of death and others
Paul Klein v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 22-15865
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL SCOTT KLEIN
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., [13] FAC, MOREDA, WARREN, Rev;[13] FAC and others
Stanley Rimer v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 18-16273
Plaintiff - Appellant: STANLEY RIMER
Defendant - Appellee: BRIAN SANDOVAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO, BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS and others
Lance Reberger v. Harold Byrne, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 17-15242
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee: HAROLD M. BYRNE, J. PARR, R. MONTOYA and others
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17289
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee: MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Kevin Almy v. Minor Adams, et al
as 16-17286
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN ALMY
Defendant - Appellee: MINOR ADAMS, DR. ARANAS, R. BAKER and others
Jacob Pratt v. Adam Laxalt, et al
as 16-16553
Plaintiff - Appellant: JACOB RAMIE PRATT
Defendant - Appellee: ADAM PAUL LAXALT, JAMES COX, CONNIE BISBEE and others
Stanley Rimer v. Brian Sandoval, et al
as 15-16621
Plaintiff / Appellant: STANLEY RIMER
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN SANDOVAL, CATHERINE CORTEZ-MASTO, BOARD OF PAROLE COMMISSIONERS and others
Edward Seely v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 14-16162
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD E. SEELY
Defendant - Appellee: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NDOC BOARD OF PRISON COMMISSIONERS, BRIAN SANDOVAL and others
Lance Reberger v. James Cox, et al
as 14-15891
Plaintiff - Appellant: LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES G. COX, RENEE BAKER, ADAM WATSON and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?