Intellectual Property Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-56744
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Bryan Pringle v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55998
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRYAN PRINGLE, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, STACY FERGUSON, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 12-55000
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, UMG RECORDINGS, INC., INTERSCOPE RECORDS and others
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al
as 11-57230
Plaintiff - Appellee: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Defendant - Appellant: STACY FERGUSON, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, EMI APRIL MUSIC, INC. and HEADPHONE JUNKIE PUBLISHING, LLC
Ebony Batts, et al v. William Adams, Jr., et al Featured Case
as 11-56921
Plaintiff - Appellant: EBONY LATRICE BATTS, an individual, AKA Phoenix Phenom and MANFRED MOHR, an individual
Defendant - Appellee: WILLIAM ADAMS, Jr., all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, ALLAN PINEDA, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas, JAIME GOMEZ, all individually and collectively as the music group the Black Eyed Peas and others
Emil Cadkin, et al v. Carlin Production Music, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-56352
Plaintiff - Appellant: EMIL CADKIN, an individual and as Trustees of the Cadkin Trust
Plaintiff: LILA CADKIN, as Trustees of the CADKIN TRUST
Defendant: LEONA BLUESTONE, ESTATE OF HARRY BLUESTONE, BLUESTONE TRUST and others
Defendant - Appellee: CARLIN PRODUCTION MUSIC and CARBERT MUSIC
Derek and Constance Lee Corp. v. Kim Seng Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-55721
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: DEREK AND CONSTANCE LEE CORPORATION, a California corporation, DBA Great River Food
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: KIM SENG COMPANY
Derek and Constance Lee Corpor v. Kim Seng Company
as 08-56687
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: DEREK AND CONSTANCE LEE CORPORATION, a California corporation, DBA Great River Food
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: KIM SENG COMPANY
Derek and Constance Lee Corpor v. Kim Seng Company
as 08-56513
Plaintiff - Appellant: DEREK AND CONSTANCE LEE CORPORATION, a California corporation, DBA Great River Food
Defendant - Appellee: KIM SENG COMPANY
Derek and Constance Lee Corpor v. Kim Seng Company
as 08-56440
Plaintiff - Appellee: DEREK AND CONSTANCE LEE CORPORATION, a California corporation, DBA Great River Food
Defendant - Appellant: KIM SENG COMPANY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?