Cases 91 - 100 of 180
Jorge Madgaleno Ramirez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-73020
Petitioner:
JORGE LUIS MADGALENO RAMIREZ, AKA Jorge Luis Magdaleno Ramirez and ANA CLAUDIA MADGALENO, AKA Ana Claudia Magdaleno
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Claudia Perez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-71250
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA EMILIA PEREZ, ENRIQUE JONATHAN FERRA-PEREZ and WENDY GUADALUPE FERRA-PEREZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Claudia Blank v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-70769
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA INNELA BLANK, AKA Claudia Innela
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Kelton Williams v. Phyllis Cheng, et al
as 14-55153
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELTON WILLIAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
PHYLLIS W. CHENG, DFEH Director, OLOPHIUS PERRY, EEOC Director, LOTTIE WOODRUFF, DFEH Employee and others
Claudia Chicas De Menjivar, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-74199
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA JEANETH CHICAS DE MENJIVAR and DANIEL ALEXANDER MENJIVAR-CHICAS
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Andrea Guzman, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72623
Petitioner:
ANDREA DEL CARMEN GUZMAN, CLAUDIA YAMILETH JOVEL-GUZMAN, LUIS EDUARDO JOVEL-GUZMAN and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Sylviana Chandra, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72533
Petitioner:
SYLVIANA CHANDRA, YONGKI RUSLIM, DIONISIUS RUSLIM and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Claudia Gomez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71972
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA LUZ GOMEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Claudia Patricia Sosa v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71794
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA SOSA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Andrea Guzman, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-71488
Petitioner:
ANDREA DEL CARMEN GUZMAN, CLAUDIA YAMILETH JOVEL-GUZMAN, LUIS EDUARDO JOVEL-GUZMAN and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
