Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Paul Grondal, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35507
Defendant: ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
Wapato Heritage, LLC,, et al v. USA, et al
as 21-35147
Defendant: ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAPATO HERITAGE LLC
Paul Grondal, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35694
Defendant: ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAPATO HERITAGE LLC and GARY REYES
L. B. v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35514
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DANA BULLCOMING, agent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs sued in his individual capacity and BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. B., individually and on behalf of D.B., a minor
Wapato Heritage LLC, et al v. USA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35357
Defendant: ARTHUR DICK, HANNAH RAE DICK, FRANCIS J. REYES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: MILL BAY MEMBERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington non-profit corporation and PAUL GRONDAL, a Washington resident
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Defendant / Appellant: WAPATO HERITAGE LLC and GARY REYES
LeeAnn McGill v. USA
as 20-35093
Defendant / Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting through the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Indian Affairs
Plaintiff / Appellee: LEEANN MCGILL
Navajo Nation v. USDOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-17088
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT and others
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NAVAJO NATION
Alturas Indian Rancheria, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 19-16885
Defendant / Appellee: VIRGIL AKINS, Northern California Agency Superintendent, Indian Affairs, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the United States Department of the Interior and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WENDY DEL ROSA and ALTURAS INDIAN RANCHERIA
Kalispel Tribe of Indians, et al v. USDOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-35808
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS, RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary of the Interior, STANLEY SPEAKS, Northwest Regional Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Plaintiff: SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the state of Washington
Plaintiff / Appellant: KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS, a federally recognized Indian tribe
L. B. v. USA, et al
as 19-35762
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DANA BULLCOMING, agent of the Bureau of Indian Affairs sued in his individual capacity and BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. B., individually and on behalf of D.B., a minor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?