Cases 31 - 40 of 309
Camran Mohammed v. People of the State of California
as 22-70164
Petitioner:
CAMRAN ABBAS MOHAMMED
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Elwood Hayes, II v. The People of the State of California
as 22-70076
Not Classified By Court:
In re: ELWOOD DUANE HAYES II
Petitioner:
ELWOOD DUANE HAYES II
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Rod Huff v. People of the State of California
as 22-70059
Petitioner:
ROD ANTHONY HUFF
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Isaiah Ramirez, Sr. v. People of the State of Califor
as 22-70028
Petitioner:
ISAIAH BENITO RAMIREZ, Sr.
Respondent:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Jason Beasley v. Christian Pfeiffer, et al
as 21-17080
Petitioner / Appellant:
JASON BEASLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Shell Energy North America (US v. FERC
as 21-71418
Petitioner:
SHELL ENERGY NORTH AMERICA (US), L.P.
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor:
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. Rob Bonta Attorney General, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION and others
People of the State of Califor v. Miguel Cardona, et al
as 21-16980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL A. CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Benjamin Serratos, II v. People of the State of Califor
as 21-16914
Petitioner / Appellant:
BENJAMIN SERRATOS II
Respondent / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Renard Brooks, Jr. v. The People of the State of Cal
as 21-16830
Petitioner / Appellant:
RENARD BROOKS, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Paul Jolivette, Jr. v. People of the State of Califor
as 21-16744
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL PATRICK JOLIVETTE, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
