Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 95
MPK, Inc., et al v. Bernardaud N.A., Inc., et al
as 20-55983
Plaintiff / Appellant: MPK, INC., a California corporation and KENNETH J. GREENBERG, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: BERNARDAUD N.A., INC., a New York corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive, CORINNE OATS, an individual and others
Sheldon Lockett, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 20-55936
Defendant / Appellee: MIZRAIN ORREGO, a Deputy Los Angeles County Sheriff, SAMUEL ALDAMA, a Deputy Los Angeles County Sheriff, JIM MCDONNELL, Sheriff and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHELDON LOCKETT
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff: MICHELLE DAVIS and CLYDE DAVIS
Andre Jefferson, et al v. Beta Operating Company, LLC, et al
as 20-55885
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANDRE JEFFERSON, an individual and HOWARD THOMPSON, an individual
Defendant / Appellant: MEMORIAL PRODUCTION PARTNERS, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, AMPLIFY ENERGY CORP., a Delaware corporation and BETA OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, DBA Beta Offshore
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55761
Defendant / Appellee: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner: GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner / Appellant: MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55750
Defendant / Appellee: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner: GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner / Appellant: NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55752
Defendant / Appellee: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner: GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor and MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner / Appellant: NINA REJUSO, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Jian Wu v. Oregon Trail Corporation, Inc., et al
as 20-55741
Defendant / Appellee: JASON ROSSO, an individual, JOHN ALVAREZ, an individual, WESLEY ROSSO, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIAN NA WU, an individual
Jason Shelton v. County of San Bernardino, et al
as 20-55724
Defendant / Appellee: GARY WHEELER, Sergeant, DEPUTY DOE #1, DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JASON SHELTON
Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Commun, et al
as 20-55657
Defendant / Appellee: BROOKDALE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES, 1 through 100, Inclusive, BKD TWENTY-ONE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation and others
Petitioner / Appellant: GENEFLOR SACRO, Proposed Intervenor
Petitioner: MISHELLE NEVERSON, Proposed Intervenor
Plaintiff / Appellee: CAROLYN D. CALLAHAN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Jian Wu v. AIM United, LLC, et al
as 20-55648
Defendant / Appellee: JASON ROSSO, an individual, WESLEY ROSSO, an individual, ERIC MARK, an individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIAN NA WU, an individual
Defendant: RALPH DURAZO, an individual, NICHOLAS BACA, an individual, BDR, INC., a California corporation and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?