Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Cesar Luna-Flores, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 19-56020
Respondent / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of DHS, U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
E. G. LUNA-BRAVO, a minor, by and through her mother and Next Friend, Melva Eliu Bravo-Morales, C. LOPEZ-LUNA, minors, by and through their mother and Next Friend Rosario Luna-Flores, ALICIA LUNA-FLORES and others
Ahmad Aljindi v. USA, et al
as 19-55926
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW P. DONOVAN, Acting Secretary, Department of the Air Force, RICHARD V. SPENCER, Secretary, Department of the Navy, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD JAMALEDDIN ALJINDI
Daniella Auningputri, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 19-55869
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA LIMBONG, ALEX LONDA, ELDRIDGE WOY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS D. HOMAN, in his official capacity as the Senior Official Performing the duties of the Director of ICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT PALAR, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, ADELENA PALAR and DANIELLA AUNINGPUTRI
East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 19-16487
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Amicus Curiae:
PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW, STATE OF ARIZONA and IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Yolany Padilla, et al v. ICE, et al
as 19-35565
Defendant / Appellant:
DAVID SHINN, Warden, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, MARC J. MOORE, Seattle Field Office Director, ICE and others
Defendant:
JOHN P. SANDERS, Acting Commissioner of CBP, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, FKA Department of Social Services, MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Deputy Director of ICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IBIS GUZMAN, BLANCA ORANTES, BALTAZAR VASQUEZ and others
Innovation Law Lab, et al v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-15716
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Axel Crespo-Gutierrez v. USCIS, et al
as 18-35638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AXEL CRESPO-GUTIERREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and LEON RODRIGUEZ, Director
Alberto Gonzalez Torres v. USDHS, et al
as 18-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO LUCIANO GONZALEZ TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Hong Kong Entertainment v. USCIS, et al
as 17-17473
Petitioner - Appellant:
HONG KONG ENTERTAINMENT (OVERSEAS) INVESTMENT, LTD., DBA Tinian Dynasty Hotel and Casino
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, ELAINE C. DUKE, in her official capacity as 8 Acting Secretary ofthe United States Department ofHomeland Security and L. FRANCIS CISSNA, in his official capacity of Director, United States Department of Citizenship and Immigration Services
Mirsad Hajro, et al v. USCIS, et al
as 17-15984
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIRSAD HAJRO and JAMES R. MAYOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, T. DIANE CEJKA, Director, USCIS National Records Center, ROSEMARY MELVILLE, USCIS District Director of San Francisco and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
