Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,002
Gonzalez v. City of Phoenix, et al.
as 24-2510
Plaintiff: LAURA GONZALEZ, individually and on behalf of the statutory beneficiaries of Ramon Timothy Lopez, and in her capacity as the Personal Representative of the estate of Ramon Timothy Lopez
Defendant: CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipality, BOBBI COZAD, OSCAR JIMENEZ and others
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff: D. DIAZ
Defendant: MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff: BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant: WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
McGhee v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-2460
Plaintiff: JOSEPH MARTIN MCGHEE
Defendant: STATE OF ARIZONA, a sovereign State of the United States of America, RYAN FORSMAN, as an individual and in his official capacity as police officer employed by the City of Flagstaff, DARA RABIN, as a private party state actor and others
Boudjerada, et al. v. Medary, et al.
as 24-2419
Plaintiff: HASHEEM BOUDJERADA, DAMON COCHRAN-SALINAS, ERIN GRADY and others
Defendant: SARAH MEDARY, Chief CHRIS SKINNER, CITY OF EUGENE and others
Jones v. Williams, et al.
as 24-2410
Plaintiff: PAUL JONES
Defendant: Warden WILLIAMS, High Desert State Prison, Corrections Officer HILL, High Desert State Prison and HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON
Jonassen v. Jacquez, et al.
as 24-2334
Plaintiff: MARTIN JOSEPH JONASSEN
Defendant: I. JACQUEZ, D. SUH, B. CRAY and others
Collins v. Sullivan
as 24-2342
Petitioner: CHASE LEE COLLINS
Respondent: WILLIAM SULLIVAN
Sivak v. Fletcher, et al.
as 24-2242
Plaintiff: LACEY SIVAK
Defendant: WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE and MARK J. BENNETT, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Olsen v. Key
as 24-2230
Petitioner: CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM OLSEN
Respondent: JAMES KEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?