Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Jenny Flores v. William Barr, et al
as 19-56326
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Karen Panosyan v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al
as 19-56308
Respondent / Appellee:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JASON PARK, Captain; in his official capacity as Commander, Theo Lacy Facility, ANDRE QUINONES, in his official capacity as Assistant Field Office Director for Orange County Detained Facilities, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
KAREN PANOSYAN
Daniella Auningputri, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 19-55869
Plaintiff:
KRISTINA LIMBONG, ALEX LONDA, ELDRIDGE WOY and others
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS D. HOMAN, in his official capacity as the Senior Official Performing the duties of the Director of ICE, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT PALAR, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated individuals, ADELENA PALAR and DANIELLA AUNINGPUTRI
Charleston Dacoff v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-55897
Respondent / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, DAVID MARIN, in his official capacity as Los Angeles Field Office Director, Office of Detention and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, in his official capacity as Warden of the Adelanto Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLESTON EDWARD DACOFF
Innovation Law Lab, et al v. Kevin McAleenan, et al
as 19-15716
Defendant / Appellant:
TODD C. OWEN, Executive Assistant Commissioner, Office of Field Operations, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, in his official capacity, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary of Homeland Security, in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA and others
Amarjit Singh v. USDC-CASD
as 19-70603
Not Classified By Court:
In re: AMARJIT SINGH, GREGORY ARCHAMBEAULT, in his official capacity as San Diego Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES DOBSON, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant San Diego Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO
Petitioner:
AMARJIT SINGH
Esteban Aleman Gonzalez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III, et al
as 18-16465
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ESTEBAN ALEMAN GONZALEZ and EDUARDO GUTIERREZ SANCHEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice and others
Alberto Gonzalez Torres v. USDHS, et al
as 18-56037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALBERTO LUCIANO GONZALEZ TORRES
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Edward Hohner v. DOJ
as 18-55886
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD DEAN HOHNER
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security; U.S. Customs Service; U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Inland Empire - Immigrant Yout, et al v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al
as 18-55564
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INLAND EMPIRE - IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE, JESUS ALONSO ARREOLA ROBLES, RONAN CARLOS DE SOUZA MOREIRA and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KIRSTJEN NIELSEN, Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, MARK J. HAZUDA, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Nebraska Service Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
