Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 310
J.S.M, et al v. William Barr, et al
as 20-17204
Defendant / Appellee: MATTHEW ALBENCE, Acting Director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, L. FRANCIS CISSNA, Acting Director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and others
Plaintiff: CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, INNOVATION LAW LAB, EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT and others
Petitioner / Appellant: J. S. M., et al
Western States Center, Inc., et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-35949
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: SARA D. EDDIE, an individual, KARIN A. POWER, Oregon State Representative, an elected official, JANELLE S. BYNUM, Oregon State Representative, an elected official and others
Jason Nsinano v. Chad Wolf, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56162
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner / Appellant: JASON SINAGWANA NSINANO
NAM, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17132
Plaintiff / Appellee: CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Defendant / Appellant: MICHAEL POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: U.S. TECH WORKERS, IMMIGRATION LAW PROFESSORS, LEADING COMPANIES AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS and others
Javier De Santiago-Perez v. William Barr, et al
as 20-56110
Petitioner: JAVIER DE SANTIAGO-PEREZ
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, WARDEN, SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Yonas Fikre v. FBI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35904
Defendant / Appellee: PAUL NAKASONE, Director of the National Security Agency, JOSEPH MAGUIRE, Acting Director of National Intelligence, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: YONAS FIKRE
Jenny Flores v. William Barr, et al
as 20-56052
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Miliam Borjas-Borjas v. William Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16957
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, COREY PRICE, in his official capacity as Interim Phoenix Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner / Appellant: MILIAM MARGARITA BORJAS-BORJAS
Jose Guerra v. Nathan Allen, et al
as 20-16943
Petitioner: JOSE EDUARDO GUERRA
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID JENNINGS, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, NATHAN ALLEN, in his official capacity as Warden, Mesa Verde ICE Processing Facility and others
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56026
Petitioner: MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent: MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?