Other Statutes Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,373
Ramirez-Delgado, et al. v. Garland
as 23-3460
Petitioner: CESAR ADOLFO RAMIREZ-DELGADO, CLAUDIA MILENA PUERTA-HERNANDEZ and JUAN MANUEL RAMIREZ-PUERTA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Alcantar, et al. v. City of Centralia, et al.
as 23-2937
Plaintiff / Appellant: BEATRIZ ALCANTAR, Personal Representative of the estate of Joshua Flores and JOSHUA FLORES, deceased
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF CENTRALIA, Washington, FREDERICK J. MERCER, Officer, AARON M. MILLER, Officer and others
Ramirez-Quezada v. Garland
as 23-2228
Petitioner: JORGE RAMIREZ-QUEZADA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez-De Mejia v. Garland
as 23-1764
Petitioner: AGUEDA ARGENTIA RAMIREZ-DE MEJIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
State of Oregon, et al v. USDC-ORP, et alIn re: State of Oregon, et al v. USDC-ORP, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-70127
Not Classified By Court: In re: STATE OF OREGON
Petitioner: STATE OF OREGON
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Plaintiff: PAUL JULIAN MANEY, GARY CLIFT, GEORGE W. NULPH and others
Defendant: PATRICK ALLEN
Valdovinos Enriquez, et al. v. Garland
as 23-1272
Petitioner: IRMA VALDOVINOS ENRIQUEZ and FERNANDO DANIEL RAMIREZ VALDOVINOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Haquet v. Garland
as 23-1084
Petitioner: ALFONSO MARTIN RAMIREZ HAQUET
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Muniz v. Garland
as 23-965
Petitioner: SOLEDAD ONEYDA RAMIREZ MUNIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Israel Maldonado Ramirez v. Judge of the Courtroom
as 23-70085
Petitioner: ISRAEL MALDONADO RAMIREZ
Respondent: JUDGE OF THE COURTROOM
Ramirez-Campos v. Garland
as 23-849
Petitioner: JUAN CARLOS RAMIREZ-CAMPOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?