Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Evanston Insurance Company v. NW Classic Builders, LLC, et al.
as 24-1259
Not Yet Classified:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, NW CLASSIC BUILDERS, LLC, a Washington limited liability company and AMTRUST INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS LIMITED, a foreign company
Defendant:
ARH & ASSOCIATES INC, a Washington corporation, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, a foreign company and AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign company
Evanston Insurance Company v. American Fire and Casualty Company, et al.
as 24-1262
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
AMERICAN FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, a foreign company, NW CLASSIC BUILDERS, LLC, AMTRUST INTERNATIONAL UNDERWRITERS LIMITED and others
Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisc, et al v. Lexington Insurance Company, et al
as 21-16557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MENOMINEE INDIAN TRIBE OF WISCONSIN, MENOMINEE INDIAN GAMING AUTHORITY, DBA Menominee Casino Resort and WOLF RIVER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S - SYNDICATES: ASC 1414, XLC 2003, TAL 1183, MSP 318, ATL1861, KLN 510, AGR 3268, UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S - SYNDICATE: CNP 4444 and others
Evanston Insurance Company v. Tracee Portee Murphy, et al
as 21-16116
Plaintiff:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
CHERELLE MURPHY, ARTHUR MURPHY, LATOYA MURPHY and others
Counter Claimant:
TRACEE PORTEE MURPHY
Glacial Cryotherapy, LLC v. Evanston Insurance Company
as 21-35505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLACIAL CRYOTHERAPY, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Evanston Insurance Company v. Winstar Properties, Inc., et al
as 19-56375
Defendant / Appellant:
MANHATTAN MANOR, LLC., a limited liability company and WINSTAR PROPERTIES, INC., a California Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
